by Cardinal Edward I. Cassidy
President of the Pontifical CouncilThe forces for wiping the unique Catholic Church from the face of this earth are in full swing by now. Her enemies want Her replaced by a church of their own making, headed by a pope of their own making, teaching the doctrines of their own making. And just as at the height of Christs love for sinful man, the Last Supper, any idea that His Sacred Body would be laid in a tomb the next day was far removed from the minds of his friends, so is it equally far removed from Catholic Minds today at the height of the Churchs love for that same sinful humanity, that His Sacred Mystical Body, His holy and unique Catholic Church, will also for a while be eclipsed by a great stone in days to come.
As we have seen, the Joint Declaration is a fraud. It is part of this eclipse. Let us now take time off to listen to the man whom the Holy Father has placed in charge of the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity.
Much of this I will pass on in silence. When it is imperative for the spiritual well-being of the readers that a comment is made, I will highlight the offending text with a light background and draw attention to its meaning with a few words.
In his Apostolic Letter Tertio millennio adveniente (1994), Pope John Paul II calls for a spirit of repentance and conversion for sins as a way of preparing well for the Great Jubilee 2000. Among the sins that require a greater commitment to repentance and conversion, he says, are "those which have been detrimental to the unity willed by God for his People" (1). The Pope asks the Church to invoke the Holy Spirit for the grace of Christian unity. Overcoming the divisions of the past which openly contradict the will of Christ and are a cause of scandal to the world, and contributing to the unity of Christians "is one of the tasks of Christians as we make our own way to the year 2000" (2). Thus according to His Holiness: "the approaching end of the second millennium demands of everyone an examination of conscience and the promotion of fitting ecumenical initiatives, so that we can celebrate the Great Jubilee if not completely united, at least much closer to overcoming the divisions of the second millennium" (3). At the threshold of the new Christian millennium, the Lutheran World Federation and the Catholic Church have taken an important step toward resolving a source of the divisions of the past. Both have, in the month of June, 1998, officially affirmed and accepted the Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification(4). In doing so, the official Response of the Catholic Church pointed to some statements in this document that seemed to need further clarification. The Lutheran World Federation also indicated certain questions that would require further study. As a result of renewed efforts made by both partners to this dialogue in the following months, these concerns were examined | |
and a mutually satisfactory document drawn up and attached to the Joint Declaration. | |
| Comment | |
|
This attachment to the JD is the Annex to the Official Common Statement. The readers can see for themselves how mutually satisfactory this attachment to the JD is. Readers, do not be alarmed, dismayed, and upset about the frequent references made by Card. Cassidy in this final document about the Lutheran World Federation and the Catholic Church. The JD was put together, signed and accepted by individual Catholics, not by the Catholic Church ... The Catholic Church comprises Our Blessed Lord, Our Blessed Lady, the Apostles, all the Martyrs who died for the difference between the Catholic Faith and any Protestant persuasion, the whole of Catholic Tradition. All these are no party to a political concordat which is the main essence of this JD. | |
Together with the President of the Lutheran World Federation, Bishop Christian Krause, I had the privilege of officially signing these texts in Augsburg, Germany, on 31 October 1999.The purpose of this article is to highlight what has been achieved in the Joint Declaration, and to indicate the implications and the limits of this important development. | |
| I. | The Achievement |
One of the most important acquisitions of the modern Ecumenical movement has been, without any doubt, the official reception by the Lutheran World Federation and the Catholic Church of the consensus document entitled the Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification. This document is the fruit of more than 30 years of dialogues, both international and national, between Lutherans and Catholics. My predecessor Cardinal Johannes Willebrands, already a decade ago stressed the importance of the Lutheran/Catholic dialogue especially for Western Christianity: "because at the heart of the Reformation in the 16th century was the conflict between Martin Luther and the authorities in Rome. Reconciliation between Lutherans and Catholics would therefore be highly symbolic as well as significant. I believe there is a special ecumenical responsibility here" (5). The dialogue itself has affirmed that the doctrine of Justification was "decisively important for the Reformation (CA IV)" (6) and could even be considered "the central point of controversy in the 16th century" (7) For all the Reformers, the doctrine of justification is seen as the article of faith on which the church stands or falls. They consider justification by faith to be a criterion or corrective for all church practices, structure and theology. It is the heart of the gospel's proclamation of God's free and merciful promises in Jesus Christ that can rightly be received only through faith. The Joint Declaration, for its part, speaks of questions of varying importance still in need of clarification (43). Nevertheless we can now say that, in regard to basic truths of the doctrine of justification, Lutherans and Catholics have reached substantial agreement. The understanding of the basic truths of the doctrine of justification described in the Joint Declaration has been accepted by the Lutheran World Federation and the Catholic Church. Both can now say that the condemnations hurled at one another in the 16th century concerning specific issues treated in the Joint Declaration, do not apply today to the other party in so far as they each subscribe to the positions elaborated in the said document. I believe that we can affirm that, on the eve of the year 2000, thanks to the grace of God and in the spirit of Tertio millennia adveniente, Lutherans and Catholics have taken a significant step toward "overcoming the divisions of the second millennium" (8). | |
| a. | The Consensus Reached on the Doctrine of Justification |
The Joint Declaration is not a new Confessional statement, nor is it a compromise document. It seeks to summarize the results of the Lutheran/Roman Catholic dialogue on this doctrine over a period of some 30 years by stating what each community holds as its faith in basic truths of this doctrine and showing that the two explications of these basic truths are not contrary one to the other. The Declaration in fact states that it has the following intention: | |
"to show that on the basis of their dialogue the subscribing Lutheran churches and the Roman Catholic Church are now able to articulate a common understanding of our justification by God's grace through faith in Christ. It does not cover all that either church teaches about justification, it does encompass a consensus on basic truths of the doctrine of justification and shows that the remaining differences in its explication are no longer the occasion for doctrinal condemnation" (JD 5). | |
| Comment | |
|
The Catholic Church was not a subscribing Church. Only Catholics were. It is amazing to read that there is consensus on the basic truths of justification but that the JD does not cover all that either church teaches about justification. Here we see confirmed officially what we discovered in the JD. How can the basic truths be there when not all teaching is there? What truth is there outside the basic truths? Is it capable of nullifying these basic truths? As we discovered in the JD, the basic truths of either church were not there. They were carefully hidden, but were uncovered ... | |
A fundamental principle in ecumenical dialogue is that there may be a distinction between the doctrines of faith and the manner in which these doctrines are formulated or expressed. This was stated already at the opening of the Second Vatican Council by Pope John XXIII, and is a basic principle of the Ecumenical Directory of the Holy See published in 1993. In other words, the same truth may be expressed in different traditions in diverse forms, without that necessarily implying diversity in faith. Differences in expression are not necessarily contradictory or mutually exclusive. Of course, the theological dialogue, and then the Churches concerned, have to discern when this is the case. Diversity of expression may enrich faith understanding. It may also, however, wound unity and divide Christians. The text that we are considering takes themes that have separated Lutherans and Catholics for centuries and seeks to show how they can now be seen as complimentary position, while emphasising distinctive Lutheran and Catholic concerns. The method followed is to set down firstly our common faith on each of the truths dealt with, and then where necessary explain the different approach or emphasis that each party traditionally follows in regard to a particular truth. The Joint Declaration begins with a Preamble and then gives the main points of the biblical message of God's work of justifying fallen human beings. This is followed by an analysis of the doctrine of justification as an ecumenical problem between the Catholic Church and the churches stemming from the Reformation. The result of recent dialogues is then stated as the present-day common, or shared understanding of justification. The document sets forth in some detail the following seven basic components of this common understanding:
It is not possible to dwell at length on the contents of the Joint Declaration in more detail in this article. I must, however, present what may be termed the three basic truths on the doctrine of justification concerning which the Catholic Church and the Lutheran World Federation has reached a consensus. These are found in the Joint Declaration, in Section 3, 14-18. Firstly, justification is a free gift bestowed by the Trinitarian God and centres on the person of Christ who became incarnate, died and rose. In being related to the person of Christ through the work of the Holy Spirit, we enter into a condition of righteousness. This is not something that we merit, but is freely bestowed. And so "together we confess: By grace alone, in faith in Christ's saving work and not because of any merit on our part, we are accepted by God and receive the Holy Spirit, who renews our hearts while equipping and calling us to good works" (15). Secondly, we receive this salvation in faith. Faith is itself God's gift through the Holy Spirit who works through word and sacrament in the community of believers and who, at the same time, leads believers into that renewal of life that God will bring to completion in eternal life. Hence, the reality of justification is linked to faith, but not simply as an intellectual assent of the mind. Rather the believer is to give him/herself over to Christ in the renewal of life. Thirdly, justification points to the heart of the Gospel message, but must be seen in an organic unity with all the other truths of faith: Trinity, Christology Ecclesiology and Sacraments. "It stands in an essential relation to all the truths of faith, which are to be seen as internally related to each other. It is an indispensable criterion which constantly serves to orient all the teaching and practice of our Churches to Christ" (18). | |
The common understanding of justification expressed in the Joint Declaration is Trinitarian and Christocentric in character. The core of it, to cite the Joint Declaration (n. 15), is that "in faith we together hold the conviction that justification is the work of the Triune God. The Father sent his Son into the world to save sinners. The foundation and presupposition of justification is the incarnation, death and resurrection of Christ. Justification thus means that Christ himself is our righteousness, in which we share through the Holy Spirit in accord with the will of the Father" (n. 15). | |
| Comment | |
|
... we together hold the conviction that justification is the work of the Triune God .... How common is the understanding as expressed in the JD? Once again we are served up the total absence of the fundamental difference between Lutherans and Catholics: Is this unmerited justification given in mere passivity on the human level as a covering by Christs merit, leaving the human being totally sinners, implying arbitrariness in God as to whom He gives justification and to whom He does not give it? This is again strongly suggested by the words used here by Card. Cassidy: that justification means that Christ himself is our righteousness as our covering, to make us pleasing to His heavenly Father. Or is this unmerited justification given as a grafting on the stem of Christ after a supernatural act of Faith has been made by a human being in conformity with the whole of Sacred Scripture? Just how common is this fundamental difference not only in understanding (as the next line in Card. Cassidys overview states), but in Faith? | |
How appropriate it is that we have arrived, together with the Lutheran World Federation at this common understanding of justification which praises the work of the Triune God and focuses on the saving work of Christ, precisely at the time of our formal preparations for the year 2000. For these preparations following the plan of Tertio millennia adveniente, are designed to praise the Triune God and are "deeply charged with Christological significance" (TMA, n. 31). Certainly for Catholics this achievement enhances our preparations for the Great Jubilee and provides a decisive ecumenical step into the new century. As we commemorate in the Year 2000 the Birth of Christ, we are now able to say, in humility and with gratitude to God, that we have tried to respond to the prayer of Our Lord for his disciples, "that they may all be one" (Jn 17:21) and that there are some tangible results that we can now offer, even though we realize that we still have a long way to go towards the goal of visible unity to which Christ calls us. | |
| b. | The Meaning of the Joint Declaration |
In affirming the Joint Declaration, Lutheran and Catholic authorities in effect have also indicated that the doctrine of justification presented therein does not contradict the teaching of that doctrine as found in their authoritative sources; on the Catholic side in the Council of Trent, and on the Lutheran side in the Lutheran Confessions. Rather it is in clear continuity with the essential understanding of that doctrine formulated, on both sides, in the 16th century. But how have we come to this point? | |
| Comment | |
|
... Catholic authorities in effect have indicated that the doctrine presented here does not contradict the teaching of that doctrine as found in their authoritative sources ... the Council of Trent ... In any other context this would be classed as a lie; so here we call it a serious infringement of the truth. The Council of Trent was initiated, supervised and concluded by the legitimate Pope of the day and so shared in the Holy Churchs infallibility. It had a thorough grasp of the Lutheran doctrine on Justification from first-hand witnesses, scrutinised it, rejected it as Catholic and condemned it in the Holy Spirit. Anticipating what follows in the next paragraph, it did not have insufficient mutual understanding, did not labour under misinterpretation nor under excessive mistrust. As a legitimate Council of the Church, it remains, with Christ, for all times, yesterday, today, forever. (Hebr. 13: 8) Rather it (the JD) is in clear continuity with the essential understanding ... This gross infringement of the truth also comes from the father of lies as it destroys faith in the Council of Trent in preference for the modern egalitarianism in relation to the building of the One-World Church (Pope St. Pius X, 1910). So, How have we come to this point? Simple. By burying what Trent found and condemned under the bulldozing effect of the modern false ecumenism. | |
Historical and dogmatic studies, especially in the ecumenical context of recent times, have been able to clarify the polemical context of the 16th century, including the political, social, theological, and philosophical influences at work as each side formulated, at that time, its understanding of this doctrine, and formulated also the condemnations made against the perceived positions of the other. These studies have been able to show that "a number of the differences were caused by insufficient mutual understanding in part also by misinterpretation and excessive mistrust. Others were due to different modes of thought and expression" (9). These studies, which were also encouraged by Pope John Paul II, (10) have therefore provided the intellectual and theological basis needed for careful re-evaluation of the other's positions, and the clear intention of our own. Furthermore the contemporary ecumenical movement, urging "a change of heart" and a "newness of attitudes", while calling for prayer "to the divine Spirit for the grace to be genuinely self-denying, humbler, gentle in the service of others, and to have an attitude of brotherly generosity toward them" (Unitatis redintegratio, n. 7), helped foster the spiritual basis and strength necessary to take the committed steps implied by such a re-evaluation. For Catholics these steps are also rooted within the teaching of the Second Vatican Council which made explicit that one of its "chief concerns was promoting the restoration of unity among all Christians" (Unitatis redintegratio, n. 1). | |
| c. | The Ecumenical Implications of the Joint Declaration |
Rapprochement on the issue of justification is obviously of importance for reconciliation of Lutherans and Catholics because this question has been seen as a church-dividing issue between them. The doctrine of justification received attention in the Lutheran/Catholic dialogue from the beginning. The report of the first phase of international dialogue in 1972 included five paragraphs on "the problem of the doctrine of justification". The report noted that on this question of justification, "the traditional polemical disagreements were especially sharply defined". But it also noted that "today, however, a far-reaching consensus is developing in the interpretation of justification" (12). And even then, perspectives were presented opening the way to rapprochement. "Catholic theologians", the report said, "also emphasize in reference to justification that God's gift of salvation for the believer is unconditional as far as human accomplishments are concerned. Lutheran theologians emphasize that the event of justification is not limited to individual forgiveness of sins, and they do not see in it a purely external declaration of the justification of the sinner" (13). The second phase of international dialogue kept this emerging far- reaching consensus in view, mentioning it in two of the reports it published, in 1980 and 1981 (14) At the same time significant reports on Justification were developed in national Lutheran-Catholic dialogues in the USA (Justification by Faith, 1985) (15) and in Germany (The Condemnations of the Reformation Era. Do They Still Divide?, 1986) (16). These provided extensive discussion of the issues, and strengthened the growing conviction that a Lutheran/Catholic consensus on justification was possible. When the third phase of international Lutheran/Catholic dialogue began in 1986, these two national studies were especially valuable as the Commission developed a lengthy report, completed in 1993, entitled "Church and Justification: Understanding the Church in the light of the Doctrine of Justification" (17). Thus, when at the request of the Lutheran World Federation and the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity a small Lutheran-Catholic working group was formed in 1993, to begin development of a joint declaration on the doctrine of justification, | |
| it had impressive resources available to it, resources which already indicated common views between Catholics and Lutherans on this central point of controversy. | |
| Comment | |
|
... it had impressive resources available ...
None as impressive as the Council of Trent which was also available but had to be obliterated beforehand on, as we saw, very shoddy, in fact insulting, grounds. ... resources which already indicated common views ... That was the whole idea of the obliteration of Trent. According to the researches of the Council of Trent there was no common ground between Lutheran and Catholic faith on justification. | |
The doctrine of justification is, however, an important issue also for rapprochement between Catholics and other churches coming from the Reformation. It was within Western Christianity that conflict on this central issue took place. Thus we should not be surprised that the doctrine of justification was taken up at length in the Anglican-Roman Catholic International Commission in its 1987 study Salvation and the Church (18). The Co-Chairmen of that Commission indicated that in preparing this text it had been "greatly helped by the statement Justification by Faith [...] (approved) by the Lutheran-Roman Catholic Consultation in the USA" (19). The Reformed/Roman Catholic International dialogue also treated Justification in some detail in the 1990 report of its second phase (20). A brief treatment was also given in a report of the Methodist/Roman Catholic International dialogue (21). Thus, while the Joint Declaration is an historic and decisive step forward in Lutheran/Catholic relations, it may well be that this official breakthrough in one bilateral relationship might contribute to fostering formal reconciliation on this question between Catholics and others as well. Whether or not this takes place, what has been achieved in this mutual agreement of the Joint Declaration surely is an historic development of particular importance in the history of Western Christianity, and indeed for the whole ecumenical movement as well, since it illustrates that ecumenical progress can be made on questions that are of central importance, and have long been seen as church-dividing issues. | |
| II. | The Limits of Our Achievement |
If the doctrine of justification was "the central point of controversy in the 16th century", we may now ask to what extent, then, does the agreement on this doctrine by the Lutheran World Federation and the Catholic Church bring the conflict between Catholics and Lutherans to a close? While we most certainly need to celebrate the significance of the Joint Declaration which has overcome such a significant barrier, we also need to be clear about the limits of the agreement reached. The declaration brings the Catholic Church and the member churches of the Lutheran World Federation which affirmed it a clear step closer to unity. They have not yet, however, achieved the goal of full, visible unity. The official responses to the Joint Declaration, while affirming the basic consensus of justification presented, confirm this by indicating questions closely connected with the consensus set out in that document that require further study. The Lutheran response refers in this connection to Numbers 18, 28-30, and 38. Numbers 21, 22 and 29-30 are indicated in the response of the Catholic Church as needing deeper clarification. Moreover, the Joint Declaration (43) lists other questions of varying importance that have still to be taken up and examined by the dialogue Commission: the relationship between the Word of God and church doctrine, ecclesiology, authority in the church, ministry, the sacraments and the relation between justification and social ethics. And even in recent decades, as both communities have participated in the modern ecumenical movement, some new differences between us have emerged which can cause difficulty in our mutual journey toward visible unity. The achievement of the Joint Declaration offers a strongly hopeful and significant step toward rapprochement between two families of Christians separated from each other since the time of the Reformation. Since, however, it does not bring us to the full visible unity we seek, Catholics are not able to share the Eucharist with their Lutheran brothers and sisters. For, while common prayer should increase between us, we do not yet share the "oneness in faith, worship and ecclesial life" (22) which, for Catholics, is required for Eucharistic sharing. Our common participation in the Eucharist awaits the full ecclesial communion which we seek, and for which the Eucharist will be the sign par excellence. | |
| III. | The Pastoral Implications of the Joint Declaration |
Before concluding these reflections on the Joint Declaration it would seem very opportune to indicate some of the pastoral implications of the fact that the Catholic Church and the Lutheran World Federation have both officially affirmed. Surely this must have a significant impact from now on in the relations between Lutheran and Roman Catholic churches. A first consequence of the signing of this document is the realisation that we have been able to overcome one of the fundamental differences that have distinguished us as two communities. This should have a positive and real effect not only on the future theological dialogue, but also on our communities at every level. We should now be able to appreciate more all that binds us together as sons and daughters of the one Lord, to whom we look as the one Mediator between God and his people. Serious difficulties remain, but they are secondary to what we hold in common. No longer may we look upon our different expressions of faith as being like two huge canons drawn up in battle line and facing each other! Secondly, we must now be deeply aware of the need to move further along the path to unity. We have not reached the end of the road. We have certainly made good progress and opened the way to further achievements. Let us all beware, however, not to place new obstacles along that way. | |
| We must avoid developments in doctrine and in ecumenical relationships that would hinder our progress towards the unity we seek. At the same time, we have to be sure that our attitudes, our words, our devotions and our understandings respect fully the truths we have set out so clearly in the Joint Declaration. | |
| Comment | |
|
We must avoid developments in doctrine ... that would hinder our progress to the unity we seek. This surely brings out in all its clarity that the Council of Trent was the infallible work of the Holy Spirit and the whole modern ecumenical Babel is not, even if it is hailed everywhere as the work of the Holy Spirit. Every orthodox Catholic knows that development of doctrine is the work of the Holy Spirit Who as God is totally free. Here He is bound up, gagged and blindfolded by Cassidy so He cannot see (and interfere with) the Protestant acceptance of justification by catholics. Here He is told not to let any Pope declare the Dogma of Mary, Mediatrix of all Graces, because that would not only thoroughly upset the catholic drive to the false ecumenism, would not only upset the Lutherans because of their erroneous faith in justification, which they would love to see accepted as the catholic faith, but would also thoroughly upset all the catholics who see nothing wrong with the global unification by means of utterly Protestant Joint Declarations. No more development of Catholic doctrine without prior permission from Cassidy, who speaks on His and the Churchs behalf on our progress in the christian unity we seek ... At the same time we have to be sure that our attitudes ... fully respect the truths we have set out so clearly in the Joint Declaration. At the expense of the Truths the Holy Spirit has set out so clearly in the Council of Trent and in the infallible Catholic Tradition. Vatican II never contradicted Trent. For there is only ONE Truth: Christ, and ONE Spirit of Truth, the Holy Spirit (John 15:26). | |
Thirdly, we are reminded by the declaration of the new life that we have received, not through any merit of ours, but through the free gift of Jesus Christ. This is cause for constant thanksgiving and celebration, something that we can and should do together far more often than in the past. It is good to remember also that what we have achieved in the Joint Declaration is not primarily the result of the efforts of those involved, but of the grace that comes to us from the Holy Spirit. Prayer has played an important role and prayer for unity continues to be an essential part of our ongoing relations. And then, fourthly, we are also reminded of our responsibility to live fully the new life that has been so freely given to us. Catholics and Lutherans are called to give witness to their faith in Christ to the world of the coming third Christian Millennium. Justification calls for transformed living. Together we can now proclaim to the world the same good news of justification by faith in Christ. As I stated in July 1997 before the General Assembly of the Lutheran World Federation in Hong Kong: To those citizens of today who are so often the victims of false and questionable values created by materialism and secularisation, Lutherans and Catholics can now confess together, in the words of the Joint Declaration, "that all persons depend completely on the saving grace of God for their salvation" (JD 19). To those who are broken-hearted, or feel overwhelmed by the manifold threats to life and to well-being, we can now confess together "that the faithful can rely on the mercy and promises of God" (JD 34). To those who feel deeply the burden of guilt for sins committed in the past, or of a sinful life today, we can now "confess together that God forgives sin by grace and at the same time frees human beings from sin's enslaving power and imparts the gift of new life in Christ" (JD 22). To those citizens today who, as in the time of St Paul, are looking for the unknown God, we can now "confess together that in Baptism the Holy Spirit unites one with Christ, justifies and truly renews the person" (JD 28), and "that persons are justified by faith in the Gospel 'apart from works prescribed by the law' (Rom 3:28)" (JD 31). To do this more effectively we need also to grow together in Christ. The Joint Declaration must not remain a document somewhere over there in Geneva and Rome. What we have achieved must become part of the lives of our parishes and congregations, wherever they are. How this can best be done needs to be studied and carried out at the local level. One suggestion that I would make is that the Bible Studies on justification that the Lutheran World Federation and the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity prepared together a couple of years ago be taken up and reflected on jointly by Lutheran and Catholic congregations. Famous within the ecumenical movement is the "Lund Principle". The report of the Third World Conference on Faith and Order at Lund in 1952 requested the churches: "to consider whether they are doing all they ought to do to manifest the oneness of the People of God. Should not our churches ask themselves [...] whether they should not act together in all matters except those in which deep differences of conviction compel them to act separately?" (23). This important principal was presented as a request by the Faith and Order World Conference at Lund. Perhaps now, as Lutherans and Catholics have declared agreement on an important aspect of the Apostolic faith, they need to adopt the Lund Principal as a theological responsibility. Should they not commit themselves to deepen the degree of unity they share by seeking to act together in all matters except those in which deep differences of conviction compel them to act separately? | |
| IV. | Conclusion |
Even with its limits, the Joint Declaration can be seen as a sign that, as the Decree on Ecumenism stated, "the Lord of the Ages wisely and patiently follows out the plan of His Grace on behalf of us sinners. In recent times he has begun to bestow more generously upon divided Christians remorse over their divisions and a longing for unity" (Unitatis redintegratio, n. 1). We need, above all, to give thanks to God for this achievement. In the Catholic Church's preparation for the Great Jubilee, the year 1998, in which the official responses to the JD of both the Lutheran World Federation and the Catholic Church were published, was dedicated to the Holy Spirit. We call to mind that the great mystery of the Incarnation which is the focus of the Great Jubilee "was accomplished by the Power of the Holy Spirit" (TMA, n. 44). We are reminded of the abiding influence of the Holy Spirit in the Church. We can recall, in regard to ecumenism that the Second Vatican Council stated without hesitation that the movement for the restoration of unity among all Christians is "fostered by the grace of the Holy Spirit" (Unitatis redintegratio, n. 1). This agreement between Lutherans and Catholics has been fashioned by decades of theological dialogue, has been supported by prayer for unity, and is a tribute to the persistence of the Lutheran World Federation and the Catholic Church to see it through. And yet we would surely be remiss if we did not acknowledge our belief that behind all of this, were impulses fostered by the grace of the Holy Spirit who is the Spirit of unity, who assists us in responding to the prayer of Christ for his followers, "that they may all be one" (Jn 17:21). And so with the psalmist we proclaim: "O give thanks to the Lord for he is good, his steadfast love endures forever!" (Ps 118:1). We give thanks to the Lord for this decisive step forward on the way to overcoming the division of the church. "We ask the Holy Spirit to lead us further toward that visible unity which is Christ's will" (JD 44). | |
| Notes | |
| The Notes have almost all been taken from either Protestant sources or from combined sources, just as dishonest and untrustworthy as is the Joint Declaration. Papal and Vatican II sources have been manipulated and twisted to suit our unity we seek ... | |
For further reading consult the following:-
Both these articles are on the following web page: http://www.pipeline.com.au/users/frits/default.HTM This page can also be reached by clicking on the AMAIC Internet Homepage link at the bottom of the AMAIC Bookroom Home Page.
| |
January 1, 2000 | |