In Chapter One we were made aware of the existence of a massive body of Western elite, which had adopted a philosophy of which Communism is one logical expression.

          We accepted the fact that this body of the “new order intellectuals” of necessity contained a very large slice of Catholic intelligentsia since it is made up of people who have uprooted themselves from the Catholic Tradition which lies at the foundation of the European Civilization.

          A study of the philosophy of this “new order” and of the “Nouvelle Théologie” of Prof. N. M. Wildiers confirms our strong suspicion that, inevitably, it has, as its chief characteristic, Teilhard’s evolutionary principle of Sameness and Identity since it broke away from the age-old Catholic Philosophy which, even long before St. Thomas Aquinas, had as its foundation principle the Real Distinction between God and Creation and between matter and spirit.

          But it was not until His Holiness Pope Pius XI illuminated our natural understanding of these things with the supernatural insights of Faith, when, in his celebrated encyclical against Atheistic Communism, he taught us with the force of the highest teaching authority in the Church that Communism is absolutely contrary to the Natural Law itself and that it is rooted in evolution which abolishes the real distinction between God and matter, between the Creator and the creature, between the natural and the Supernatural. Therefore, whoever accepts a new order and a new philosophy of which Communism is a logical expression and a psychological and emotional ‘blood brother’, must have embraced a philosophy absolutely contrary to Natural Law itself and which must be rooted in evolution for Communism to be able to be a logical and emotional expression of it.

          We do know that the Western Catholic intelligentsia has adopted a philosophy of evolution: Teilhardism, which has rejected Thomism and the Real Distinction principle, and which does have as its starting point the totally inadmissible principle of identity and sameness of everything in the one plane: evolution.

(Cf. Teilhard de Chardin in all his works, but especially in his 1922 paper against Original Sin, his 1929 paper The Human Sense, his books The Phenomenon of Man and The divine Milieu and in his 1947 paper, his third against Original Sin).

          We further know that this philosophy, and the “Nouvelle Théologie” (Dutch ‘catechism’!) to which it gave birth, were forcefully and persistently presented at the Second Vatican Council ‘as genuine expressions of Catholicism’ only to be equally forcefully and persistently filtered out and rejected through the direct protection by the Holy Spirit.

          As we saw, there is not a trace of Modernism or evolution in any Council document, notwithstanding the totally misleading picture painted by people like Michael Davies who in his infamous book Pope John’s Council contrives to ‘prove’ his erroneous preconceived idea that, since there was a marked influence of the Rhine at the Council, it had to prevail ... . The Holy Spirit only used the miserable attempts by the ‘Rhine’ group to shape the Cross necessary for the purification and correction of orthodox Catholics, but not for the formulation of doctrine contrary to Traditional Teaching.

          And since Michael Davies and his group of ‘Tridentiners’ reject this Cross in preference to the sterile suffering of disobedience and schism, they reject the Council which offered this Cross in Name of Our Holy Mother the Church for the salvation of the world.

          They have rejected this Cross and this Sacred Council at their peril. For with their action they have also rejected the Supernatural Light so necessary to make this Cross meaningful. And they have led thousands astray with their endless prattle at the base of the Towering Rock of Peter, which they have now declared and pointed out as a shipping hazard to the delight of the Modernists. For what more could the Modernists hope for than that, at the very time of the most concentrated attack on the foundations of the Catholic Church and the Papacy, the so-called ‘injustices’, which the Tridentiners imagine have been meted out to them, have made ordinary Catholics silent and sullen in the defence of the Council and the Papacy, because of the totally mistaken idea that these devilish attacks could come from the Church Herself, a church-gone-wrong.

          Theirs is a defamation of the Majesty of God, which they will come to regret. At the very moment that the Catholic Church is fighting the battle of Her life for Her credibility and even for Her visible presence amongst us, these people believe and preach that, at the most crucial moment of the Catholic Church’s long history, God gave to His Church a Council which is so unsure and unsound that it is to be ignored and rejected. And gave us a Holy Father Pope Paul VI ‘heretical enough’ to implement these unsure and unsound teachings of the Council. Perish the thought ...!

          What, then, is at stake?

          At stake is the credibility and the visible presence of the Catholic Church amongst us here on earth. Ever since the Sacred Council, the Modernists and Marxists have ravaged our Holy Mother the Catholic Church and torn Her apart. Their philosophy and theology, their evolution and heresies were thrown out by the Church in Vatican II in no uncertain manner. That should have been the end of the story. That it is not shows that, in their absolute determination to destroy every vestige of the Catholic Church, A BYPASS HAD TO BE FOUND.

          And found it was ...

          What, then, is this fools-gold of tantalising beauty which is considered so valuable that our modernistic Catholic elite and intelligentsia has sold everything, including its intellectual honesty and even its birthright to Everlasting Life in order to possess it? In the colossal pretence that, through them, the Holy Church is now in bondage to acknowledge the value of their mesmerising ‘vision’?

          What is considered so important for introduction into the Catholic fold, that, even after its ignominious rejection at the Council, a detour simply had to be found in order to introduce it at all cost? To force it on us?

          Is it evolution?

          No, it is not. Nobody believes in evolution. Teilhardian evolution is absurd. But it is the only syringe that contains the deadly poison, the lethal drug ... . After the injection, the empty syringe is useless and is discarded ...

          Is it Existentialism?

          No, it is not. Existentialism is only a system of thought to give bogus existences to things that do not exist, preventing a serious study of the nature of the contraband. But here again, although, useless in itself, existentialism is nevertheless indispensable as a mask and a wrapping to hide the murderous face of the one that holds the deadly weapon ...

          No, the solution to solving the riddle of what is driving our Modernists will have to be found in something far more mundane and down-to-earth. In something that is lure enough to make people subordinate everything else to it in their unholy quest for its acquisition.

          What did Bishop William Adrian of Nashville, Tennessee, say was the main issue at the Second Vatican Council? Did he not say:

“The main issue at the Second Vatican Council was really that of collegiality, or the question of how the bishops as a body could somehow rule over the Church, the Pope holding only a Primacy of honour, not of jurisdiction independent of the bishops?”

          And did Fr. Wiltgen in his book The Rhine flows into the Tiber not agree with him in these words:

“The most important and dramatic battle which took place at the Second Vatican Council was not the widely publicized controversy over Religious Liberty, but the one over Collegiality, which happened mostly behind the scenes ...”

          Thus the name of the game is POWER. Hunger for Power to Control ...

          But naked aggression too early displayed is resisted and squashed. It is better to use something that is subtle but eminently effective, something that can even make people excited enough to make this power-to-control seem necessary, so it becomes acceptable without unnecessary violence. Not before it becomes popular to persecute. And when will that be?

          According to the American sociologist H. Blumer (“Collective Behavior” in Principles of Sociology, A. M. Lee edition, New York, 1951, pp. 165-222), four fundamental factors are important for the success of a new, social movement:

First, a general uneasiness in which men are responsive to a new appeal;

Second, a popular rising, in which all are agreed as to the sources of the difficulty and in which the goals of the movement are clearly defined;

Third, indoctrination, i.e. the creation of a body of dogmas and a vanguard of adherents to disseminate them; and

Fourth, institutionalization which is necessary in order to realize the goals of the movement.

          We could not wish for a better birth certificate of the forth-coming “One-World ‘Church’ ” predicted and foreseen by His Holiness Pope St. Pius X already in 1910.

• EVOLUTION has created a world-wide uneasiness with regard to Christianity and especially with regard to the Catholic Church in Her prohibitions against Teilhard de Chardin.

• ECUMENISM has become the popular uprising in which all are asked to agree that “the old Church” is the source of the difficulty. The Catholic Church with Her claim to uniqueness has kept us all divided.

• MODERNISM with its ‘group dynamics’, ‘sensitivity training’ and ‘audacity’, is meant to release the pent-up feelings of frustration and will consolidate these vague notions into “dogmas of reasonableness” by indoctrination, by which Catholics who refuse to go along with it can be singled out as queer, unreasonable splitters; and finally the new,

• ONE-WORLD CHURCH of Ecumenism and Unity will institutionalize it all on a world wide scale, in the name of the World Council of Churches and the Holy Spirit ...

          Only then will it be popular to persecute, in the name of world unity and in the name of the Holy Spirit, all those who will not conform and refuse admission.

          With such global power at stake, the Modernists simply could not accept the defeat received in the Second Vatican Council. For they knew that underneath evolution and existentialism, and inside the syringe and the masquerading wrapping, lies hidden the one ingredient vital to the success of their whole power struggle and global conquest:

“The Philosophy of Sameness”, the “Principle of Identity” ...

          For the success of the whole movement it is imperative that millions of lukewarm, materialistic, browned-off Catholics make their entry into the new, man-made Church of Darkness to create the illusion that the Catholic Church Herself has entered under their powerful guidance.

          For this to happen the false ecumenism is absolutely essential since it possesses the one ingredient necessary for success: this Principle of Sameness. Divisions in Christianity are only apparent: deep down, all Christians are the same ... . Global unification requests as a necessary prerequisite: pluralism in doctrine (“it is all the same what you believe”), which in turn requires the abolition of Catholic Dogma (e.g. the Assumption), since it is precisely this pluralism-in-doctrine which gives the illusion of “sameness for all”. It is all the same if you believe in Mary’s Assumption or not; your beliefs are your personal affair as long as you do not believe in absolutes: Absolute Truth and an Absolute Moral Code.

          For global unification also demands pluralism-in-morality, so morality can become adaptable to situations which is incompatible with an absolute moral code: the Ten Commandments. It is all the same, really, if you practise abortion or not, as long as you do not declare anything absolute except relativity in morals.

          This principle of sameness and identity between the natural and the supernatural, between ‘relative’ and ‘absolute’ does, of course, not exist: it has only the appearance, the illusion, of existence: a veritable existentialist existence. But it has been laid at the root and heart of Modernism so much so, that no Modernist, be he Hans Kung, Karl Rahner, Fr. Arnold Hogan or Sr. Peter Traviss; no architect of the “Church of Darkness”, no agent of the false ecumenism, can open his or her mouth, however cautiously, without being instantly recognised by it. And this by the saving Will of God, Who is asking a veritable Cross from His followers at the present time, but not deception ...

          This ‘philosophy of sameness and identity’ is the fundamental and eternal enemy of the Real Distinction, and here, at the core of the battle for the safeguarding of the Real Distinction, the Catholics have their most Powerful Ally: Transubstantiation, or Christ Himself in the Blessed Eucharist. For here, the Real Distinction comes to Life; here it is Lived; here it becomes elevated to Dogma: eternally true, the Word of God Himself. What was bread before the Consecration ceases to be bread after it, and a totally new Substance, totally and Really Distinct from the substance of bread, takes its place: the Body of Our Lord Jesus Christ.

          No wonder, then, that the fury of Hell on earth: Modernism, has raised its greatest howl and outcry against this most sacred Dogma of the Catholic Church. For if this Real Distinction is allowed to remain, all real distinctions are saved and kept in place, and the ‘philosophy of sameness’ is doomed.

          In one of the worst books ever printed in defence of Modernism: What are the theologians saying?, in which the compiler, one Monika Hellwig, allows Satan to spew his venom over the sacred teaching of the Church, the Dogma of Transubstantiation is mercilessly attacked in hatred:

“The Pope’s personal judgement was that for most adult Catholics today the full spiritual meaning of the Eucharist is carried in the word transubstantiation. Many theologians hope (because the word is still so offensive to devout Protestant Christians, and because younger Catholics are quite confused by it) that one day it will slide out of the official formulations into history, along with transfiguration and transformation, as just one way of describing an elusive and many-faceted mystery.”

          After having attacked the teaching of Pope Paul VI in his jewel Mystery of Faith with all the lies and cunning she is capable of, this is the final summing up: “Pope Paul’s personal judgement”! After the Pontiff had gone out of his way to put before us infallible teaching held by the Catholic Church throughout the ages, and had become the third Pope in history to declare Transubstantiation a Dogma of the Church, as such defined by the Council of Trent.

          “Sliding into history and oblivion ...” against the solemn teaching of this same Pontiff in #9 of the same encyclical:

“Indeed we are aware of the fact that, among those who deal with this Most Holy Mystery in written or spoken word, there are some who with reference to the Dogma of Transubstantiation spread abroad opinions which disturb the faithful and fill their minds with no little confusion about matters of Faith. It is as if every one were permitted to consign to oblivion doctrine already defined by the Church, or else interpret it in such a way as to weaken the genuine meaning of the words or the recognised force of the concepts involved.”

          On the testimony of the Holy Father here, if the theologians are really saying what Hellwig tells us they are saying (and there is plenty of evidence in support of Hellwig’s claims), then what the Modernists are talking about is how to abort our Catholic Faith, and it is obvious that such attempts and such teaching can only come into the sheepfold by devious means: by a detour bypassing Vatican II. [Karl Rahner gets pride of place in Hellwig’s book; his thoughts and teachings are expressed in 5 out of the 10 essays. In one of them, on ‘grace’, he is bracketed with ‘theologian’ Teilhard de Chardin].

          “The Gospel of the Church of Darkness” as expressed in books like What are the theologians saying? and Toward Vatican III is loud and clear: “See for yourself how reasonable the philosophy of sameness is, how reasonable our solutions are, against the unreasonabless of Catholic Dogma and the Real Distinction!” And against this, all that our good Catholics have to do is to renew their Supernatural, Infused, Divine and Catholic Faith in Transubstantiation: the Dogma that has canonized the Real Distinction. ...